Ex parte JAGGARD - Page 6




                 Appeal No. 1999-2831                                                                                     Page 6                        
                 Application No. 08/703,435                                                                                                             


                 discloses an airfoil having a central supporting section 11,                                                                           
                 an entering edge section 22 and a trailing edge section 31.                                                                            
                 The central supporting section 11 includes arcuate track                                                                               
                 members 15, upper and lower guide rollers 17 and sprockets 18                                                                          
                 driven by suitable gearing.  The entering edge section 22 and                                                                          
                 the trailing edge section 31 each includes an arcuate arm 28                                                                           
                 (which may be an I-beam in cross section) having rollers 30                                                                            
                 for engaging the track members 15 and a rack 29 for meshing                                                                            
                 with the associated sprocket 18.  As can be seen from a review                                                                         
                 of Figures 1, 2 and 7, the guide rollers 17 do not engage that                                                                         
                 portion of the arm 28 which contains the rack 29.3                                                                                     


                          The appellant argues (brief, page 6, and reply brief,                                                                         
                 pages 6-8) that claim 1 is not anticipated by Burnelli since                                                                           
                 Burnelli does not teach or suggest the following limitation of                                                                         
                 claim 1: "at least one roller track coextending with said rack                                                                         
                 adjacent thereto, along said beam."  The examiner has                                                                                  





                          3Burnelli is further discussed on pages 1-4 of the                                                                            
                 appellant's specification.                                                                                                             







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007