Ex parte BARBER - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication is not binding precedent of the                 
          Board.                                                                      
                                                            Paper No. 15              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       

                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                               Ex parte JOHN P. BARBER                                
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 1999-2852                                  
                               Application 08/681,898                                 
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                      

          Before STAAB, McQUADE, and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent                  
          Judges.                                                                     
          CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      



                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on appeal from the examiner’s final                 
          rejection of claims 32 through 43.  Claims 1 through 31 have                
          been withdrawn from consideration.                                          
               The appellant’s invention relates to a magnetic                        

                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007