Interference No. 103,536 Page 2
Rosenthal v. Mowrey-McKee
ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count 1 (Paper 79, p. 28), the sole count in the
interference, is awarded against the junior party RUTH ANN ROSENTHAL, BARRY F. VAN
DUZEE and RAJKUMAR BHATIA.
FURTHER ORDERED that, judgment on priority as to Count 1 is awarded in favor of senior
party MARY F. MOWREY-MCKEE, DAVID W. PROUD and GEORGE E. MINNO.
FURTHER ORDERED that junior party, RUTH ANN ROSENTHAL, BARRY F. VAN DUZEE
and RAJKUMAR BHATIA, is not entitled to a patent containing claims 27-30, 32-35, 38, 40, 42, 43,
45, 59, 60, 61, 63, and 65-75 (corresponding to Count 1) of application 08/156,043, filed November 23,
1993.
FURTHER ORDERED that on the record before the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences,
senior party, MARY F. MOWREY-MCKEE, DAVID W. PROUD and GEORGE E. MINNO, is
entitled to a patent containing claims 1-11 and 13-20 (corresponding to Count 1) of Patent 5,096,607,
granted March 17, 1992, based on application 07/515,290, filed April 27, 1990.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007