LEVIEN V. KATAYAMA et al. - Page 8


                 Interference No. 103,587                                                                                                            

                          We agree with Levien that the total number of background white dots does not change in                                     
                 an area such as defined by circle B, and Katayama has provided no detailed analysis illustrating                                    
                 that the situation is otherwise.  Nevertheless, this argument is not controlling because it does not                                
                 establish that Katayama does not produce variable size dots.                                                                        
                          Levien generates a variable size dot from a plurality of adjacent dots.  Although Levien                                   
                 has no figure in its disclosure illustrating variable size dots, Levien’s patent, at column 1, lines                                
                 38-40, indicates that U.S. Patent No. 4,012,584 teaches the technique of simulating gray shades                                     
                 by varying the size of dots.  Figure 2 of the ‘584 patent shows a plurality of 18 adjacent dots (the                                
                 18 dots identified by “X” markings) forming a moderate size dot; Figure 6 of the patent shows a                                     
                 plurality of 8 adjacent dots forming a small dot; and Figure 8 shows a plurality of 30 adjacent                                     
                 dots forming a large dot.  Katayama’s technique in both its prior applications and its involved                                     
                 application is similar in that the size of dots produced is variable.  For example, the lower halves                                
                 of KX-8 and KX-9 most clearly illustrate variable size black dots and the upper halves of the                                       
                 exhibits illustrate variable size white dots.  Some dots consist of but one dot while other dots                                    
                 consist of two, three, four or more adjacent dots.  The dictionary definitions relied on by Levien                                  
                 do not exclude oblong areas as produced by Katayama as dots.5                                                                       
                                          Levien’s Belated Motion to Deny Katayama Benefit of                                                        
                                        Katayama’s Japanese Applications under 35 U.S.C. § 119                                                       
                          The belated preliminary motion of Levien to deny the benefit accorded Katayama of the                                      
                 filing date of its earlier filed Japanese applications, said preliminary motion having been filed                                   
                 nearly ten months after the March 12, 1996 deadline for filing preliminary motions, is dismissed                                    



                                                                                                                                                     
                 5  At paragraph 18 of the testimony of Raphael Levien, Levien testified to the effect that his image LX-12 comprises                
                 a printout of variable size elongated dots, each dot comprising adjacent pluralities of dots.                                       
                                                                         8                                                                           



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007