SOLOMON V. BHAGAVATULA - Page 1




                                THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                              
                                            and is not binding precedent of the Board                                                     

                                                                            Paper 24                                                      
                Filed by: Trial Section Merits Panel                                                                                      
                       Box Interference                                                                                                  
                       Washington, D.C.  20231                                                                                           
                       Tel:  703-308-9797                                                                                                
                       Fax:  703-305-0942                                                                                                
                                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                             
                                                          _______________                                                                 

                                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                              
                                                      AND INTERFERENCES                                                                   
                                                          _______________                                                                 

                                                        WILLIAM SOLOMON                                                                   
                                                              Junior Party,                                                               
                                                          (Patent 5,388,154),                                                             

                                                                    v.                                                                    

                                                    SATYASI BHAGAVATULA                                                                   
                                                              Senior Party                                                                
                                                      (Application 08/324,849).                                                           
                                                          _______________                                                                 

                                                   Patent Interference No. 103,790                                                        
                                                          _______________                                                                 

                Before: McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and SCHAFER and LEE, Administrative                                 
                Patent Judges.                                                                                                            

                PER CURIAM.                                                                                                               

                                                        FINAL JUDGMENT                                                                    

                                A.      Introduction                                                                                      
                        The parties have filed preliminary statements and have included with those statements affidavits                  
                asserted to support their respective cases for priority.  The preliminary statements have been opened and                 






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007