Interference No. 104,241 corroboration by a non-inventor. There is no evidence of corroboration accompanying Jeon et al.'s supplemental showing. Additionally, while an NMR spectrum may be consistent with a hypothetical structure for a given unknown compound it cannot without more, ordinarily, prove an unknown compound possesses a particular structure. Further, when the handwritten formula on the face of Exhibit 1 was written on the exhibit or by whom is not set forth. We also have no way of determining from Jeon's declaration who performed the analysis described in Exhibits 1, 2, 3, 6, 7 and 8 nor is there any evidence, independent of the inventor, establishing that the compound described in Jeon's notebook was the compound for which the analysis was performed. Jeon et al.'s additional evidence which allegedly establishes that the compound allegedly synthesized by Jeon would have been expected to have the same utility as structurally similar compounds known in the art is inadequate to prove that hypothesis. Specifically, in the compounds disclosed in the Gluchowski patent the imidazolinylamino moiety is linked to a benzoxazine nucleus, a nitrogen- and oxygen-containing heterocyclic ring system. In the compounds 38Page: Previous 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007