COX et al. V. ROSENBAUM et al. - Page 1

                         The opinion in support of the decision being                 
                       entered today is not binding precedent of the Board.           
          Paper 72                                                                    
          Filed by:  Trial Section Merits Panel                                       
          Box Interference                                                            
          Washington, D.C.  20231                                                     
          Tel:  703-308-9797                                                          
          Fax:  703-305-0942                                                          
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                GEORGE N. COX, BRADLEY L. ROSENZWEIG, KOHEI MIYAZONO,                 
                       CARL-HENRIK HELDIN and TAKESHI IMAMURA,                        
                                    Junior Party,                                     
                              (Application 08/356,005),                               
                         JAN S. ROSENBAUM and TSUTOMU NOHNO,                          
                                    Senior Party                                      
                              (Application 08/334,179).                               
                           Patent Interference No. 104,287                            
          Before:  McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and                  
          SCHAFER and LEE, Administrative Patent Judges.                              

          McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.                               

                         JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO 37 CFR  1.662                          
               Upon consideration of the COX REQUEST FOR ADVERSE                      
          JUDGMENT (Paper 69), it is                                                  
                    ORDERED that the request is granted.                              

Page:  1  2  3  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007