ORDER
Upon consideration of the record of this interference, it is—
ORDERED that judgment on priority as to the sole count is awarded against
junior party Chantry;
FURTHER ORDERED that Chantry is not entitled to a patent containing
claims 1-3 and 5-13 of its 5,532,151 patent, which correspond to the count;
FURTHER ORDERED that, based on the record before us, senior party
Benovic is entitled to a patent containing claims 1, 6, and 20 of its 08/464,954
patent application, which correspond to the count;
FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of Paper No. 11 be given a paper number
and be entered in the administrative record of Chantry's 5,532,151 patent; and
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007