THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 100 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ RAPHAEL L. LEVIEN Junior Party, 1 v. AKIHIRO KATAYAMA, HIDEFUMI OHSAWA and AKIKO FUKUHARA Senior Party. 2 ____________ Interference No. 103,587 ____________ Before CALVERT, URYNOWICZ and MARTIN, Administrative Patent Judges. URYNOWICZ, Administrative Patent Judge. 1 Application No. 07/476,060 filed February 6, 1990, now U.S. Patent No. 5,055,942 issued October 8, 1991. Unassigned. Reissue Application No. 08/183,694 filed January 19, 1994. Accorded Benefit of U.S. Application No. 07/476,060 filed February 6, 1990, now Patent No. 5,055,942, issued October 8, 1991. Unassigned. 2 Application No. 07/957,825 filed October 8, 1992. Accorded Benefit of U.S. Application No. 07/875,210 filed April 28, 1992, now Patent No. 5,325,448 issued June 28, 1994; U.S. Application No. 07/270,809 filed November 14, 1988; Japan Application No. 62-289152 filed November 16, 1987 and Japan Application No. 62-289170 filed November 16, 1987. Assignors to Canon Kabushiki Kaisha.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007