Interference No. 103,709
Guay v. Hunt
1. On February 8, 1999, a decision on preliminary
motions was mailed. (Paper No. 24).
2. On December 28, 1999, the parties jointly filed a
notice of settlement in which it was indicated that the
parties’ involved application and patent are now owned by a
common assignee. (Paper No. 37).
3. On December 30, 1999, the parties were ordered to
identify the common assignee and the common assignee was
ordered to show cause why judgment should not be entered
against junior party Guay. (Paper No. 38).
4. On January 11, 2000, senior party Hunt identified
Picker International, Inc. as the common assignee and
indicated that it was unaware of any ground why adverse
judgment should not be entered against junior party Guay.
(Paper No. 40).
5. On January 13, 2000, counsel for the senior party
filed a further paper indicating that the communication of
January 11, 2000, was submitted on behalf of the common
assignee, Picker International, Inc. (Paper No. 41).
Discussion
- 2 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007