Interference No. 103,710
Guay v. Hunt
2. On December 28, 1999, the parties jointly filed a
notice of settlement in which it was indicated that the
parties’ involved application and patent are now owned by a
common assignee. (Paper No. 57).
3. On December 30, 1999, the parties were ordered to
identify the common assignee and the common assignee was
ordered to show cause why judgment should not be entered
against junior party Guay. (Paper No. 58).
4. On January 5, 2000, senior party Hunt purportedly
filed a paper which identified Picker International, Inc. as
the common assignee and indicated that it was unaware of any
ground why adverse judgment should not be entered against
junior party Guay. 5. The entry-log on the jacket of
the file of this interference does not reflect an entry for
the receipt of the original paper mailed by senior party Hunt
on January 5, 2000.
6. On January 18, 2000, senior party Hunt filed by
facsimile a copy of its January 5, 2000, communication and
represented that the paper was mailed on January 5, 2000.
(Paper No. 62).
5. On January 13, 2000, counsel for the senior party
- 3 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007