Interference No. 103,769
Before METZ, PATE, and MARTIN, Administrative Patent Judges.
MARTIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
In accordance with Davis et al.'s concession of
priority as to Count 1, judgment with respect to the subject
matter of Count 1 is hereby entered against Davis et al. and
in favor of Deacon et al. As a result, Deacon et al. are
entitled to their claims which correspond to Count 1 (i.e.,
patent claims 1-4 and 7-18; reissue application claims 1-4, 7-
18, and 43-46) and Davis et al. are not entitled to a patent
including their claims which correspond to Count 1 (i.e.,
application claims 15-17, 20, and 25).
In accordance with Deacon et al.'s concession of
priority as to Count 2, judgment with respect to the subject
matter of Count 2 is hereby entered against Deacon et al. and
in favor of Davis et al. As a result, Davis et al. are
entitled to a patent including their claims which correspond
to Count 2 (i.e., application claims 1-14, 18, 19, and 21-24)
and Deacon et
- 2 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007