Interference No. 103,806
Maor v. Lange
Judgment
On December 15, 1998, senior party Lange filed a paper
informing the Board that junior party Maor’s involved
application has been assigned to General Electric Company, the
assignee of the senior party’s involved application, and thus
the involved cases of both parties are now commonly assigned.
(Paper No. 13).
On December 24, 1998, the common assignee was ordered to
show cause why judgment should not be entered against the
junior party. (Paper No. 15). The paper indicated that a
proper response to the show cause order can be an election of
the junior party as the prior inventive entity based on
evidence available to the common assignee.
On June 8, 1999, party Lange filed a paper electing
junior party Maor as the prior inventive entity with respect
to the subject matter of the count of this interference.
(Paper No. 17). It is presumed that this election is filed on
behalf of the real party of interest or common assignee of
both party’s involved application, i.e., General Electric
Company.
Based on the election by the common assignee, it is
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007