Interference No. 103,833
Judgment under 37 CFR § 1.640(e)
Before METZ, PATE, and MARTIN, Administrative Patent Judges.
MARTIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
Page 62 of the "DECISIONS ON MOTIONS, ETC."
(hereinafter "Decision") mailed May 24, 2000, states:3
Because all of Ting's involved claims have been
determined to be unpatentable for the reasons given
in the above decisions on motions, Ting is hereby
ordered pursuant to § 1.640(d)(1) to show cause why
judgment should not be entered against his patent
claims 1-40 and his reissue claims 1, 3-32, and 35-
40 on the grounds for unpatentability set forth in
Kean's motions.
In the event Ting fails to file a "paper" in
response to the show cause order, Kean has 20 days
from the date of the due date [sic] for Ting's
response in which to file a paper explaining why
judgment should not be entered against his claims
54-66, 71-73, and
75-82 as unpatentable for the reasons given in the
foregoing decisions on motions.
Replacements for pages 57-61 were faxed to the parties on
May 30, 2000 (paper No. 145). The cover sheet of that paper
changed the due date for Ting's response to the show cause
order to June 30, 2000.
Ting responded on June 30, 2000, by filing a
"provisional" request for a final hearing (paper No. 149) to
review the decisions on four of Ting's motions, which request
Paper No. 143.3
- 2 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007