Interference 104,036 Before CALVERT, METZ, and PATE, Administrative Patent Judges. CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge. JUDGMENT UNDER 37 CFR § 1.652 Barriac et al., the junior party, having failed to file a response to the order to show cause issued on June 20, 2000 (Paper No. 36) within the time set therein, it is appropriate to enter judgment against them. As stated in Paper No. 36, Foster et al. motion (1) under 37 CFR § 1.633(c)(3) (Paper No. 10) is granted, and accord- ingly the interference is being redeclared simultaneously here- with to designate Barriac et al. claims 10/1 and 11/1 as corre- sponding to count 1, and Barriac et al. claims 9/4, 10/4 and 11/4 as corresponding to count 2. Foster et al. motion (2) (Paper No. 11) is deemed withdrawn. Pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.652, judgment is entered against Barriac et al., the junior party, in view of their failure to take testimony within the time provided, as follows: Jacques J. Barriac, Douglas B. Dobbs, James R. Gillingham and Adonis Spathias, the junior party, are not entitled to claims 1 to 3, 10/1 and 11/1 of their involved patent, designated as 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007