CHAO V. IWAMOTO - Page 3

          Interference No. 104,051                                                    
          Chao v. Iwamoto                                                             

          and 27-29 which correspond to count 1; and                                  
               FURTHER ORDERED that the senior party TOSHIKAZU IWAMOTO                
          is not entitled to its application claims 7-9, 15-18, 23-26,                
          30 and  31-47 which correspond to count 2.                                  





                                                                                     
                         Richard E. Schafer         )                                 
                         Administrative Patent Judge)                                 
                                                  )                                   
                                                  )                                   
                                                 ) BOARD OF PATENT                   
                         )                                  APPEALS                   
                         Lee E. Barrett           )       AND                         
                         Administrative Patent Judge)       INTERFERENCES             
                                                 )                                   
                                                 )                                   
                                                  )                                   
                         )                                                            
                         Jameson Lee              )                                   
                         Administrative Patent Judge)                                 












                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007