JUENGERT et al. V. POPOWYCH et al. - Page 3




            Interference No. 104,159                                                                     
            Juengert v. Popowych                                                                         

                  By representation of counsel for the senior party, both                                
            the junior party’s involved patent and the senior party’s                                    
            involved application are now owned by the entities Fort Worth                                
            Tower, Inc., and CH2M Hill.Pal Telecom Group, LLC. (Paper Nos.                               
            59 and 61).  Copies of assignment documents submitted to the                                 
            board by counsel for the senior party (Paper Nos. 59 and 62)                                 
            seem to support the assertion.  In Paper No. 61, an election                                 
            was made “on behalf of Fort Worth Tower, Inc. (‘FWT’) and CH2M                               
            Hill.Pal Telecom Group, LLC (‘CH2M’),” electing the junior                                   
            party’s involved patent as being entitled to priority with                                   
            respect to the senior party’s involved application.                                          
            Accordingly, it is                                                                           
                  ORDERED that judgment is entered against senior party                                  
            NESTOR T. POPOWYCH, ROY J. MOORE, HAROLD H. SRIVER, III, and                                 
            LOUIS KEN-HON KAO;                                                                           
                  FURTHER ORDERED that NESTOR T. POPOWYCH, ROY J. MOORE,                                 
            HAROLD H. SRIVER, III, and LOUIS KEN-HON KAO are not entitled                                
            to their application claims 38-41, 43-47, 49-53, and 55-57,                                  
            which correspond to the count.                                                               





                                                    3                                                    





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007