Interference No. 104,245 Paper No. 14
Bennett v. Cerretti Page 2
Upon consideration of the record of this interference, it
is—
ORDERED that judgment on priority as to the sole count is
awarded against junior party Bennett;
FURTHER ORDERED that junior party Bennett is not entitled
to a patent containing claims 26 and 28-43 of Bennett's
08/436,032 application, which correspond to the count;
FURTHER ORDERED that Bennett is not entitled to a patent
containing claims 40-57 (renumbered as 1-18) of Bennett's
08/277,722 application, which correspond to the count;
FURTHER ORDERED that, based on the record before us,
senior party Cerretti is entitled to a patent containing
claims 15-18 and 21-44 of Cerretti's 08/739,333 application,
which correspond to the count;
FURTHER ORDERED that, based on the record before us,
Cerretti is entitled to a patent containing claims 1-4,7, 8,
11, and 12 of Cerretti's 08/271,948 application, which
correspond to the count; and
FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this decision be given a
paper number and be entered in the administrative record of
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007