Putnam v. Knudsen
Interference No. 104,383
On the afternoon of March 30, 2000, a telephone
conference was conducted between the administrative patent
judge and respective counsel for the junior and senior party.
In the telephone conference, Mr. Allen Putnam representing the
junior party indicated that the junior party’s abandonment of
the invention is not conditioned upon any ruling by the Board
as to the patentability of either party’s claims over the
supplied information.
The junior party’s request for entry of adverse judgment
against the junior party is granted.
Because the junior party has abandoned its invention
corresponding to the Count and because the junior party has
not and does not intend to file a motion for judgment under 37
CFR § 1.633(a) against the senior party’s claims, the request
for a ruling of unpatentability against both parties’ claims
over prior art is denied. It is
ORDERED that judgment as to the subject matter of the
Count is herein awarded in favor of senior party MARK F.
KNUDSEN;
FURTHER ORDERED that judgment as to the subject matter of
the Count is awarded against junior party ALLEN PUTNAM;
- 3 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007