THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION and is not binding precedent of the Board Paper 17 Filed by: Trial Section Motions Panel Box Interference Washington, D.C. 20231 Tel: 703-308-9797 Fax: 703-305-0942 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ VINCENT L. VAILLANCOURT Junior Party, (Application 08/811,779), v. LEROY D. GEIST, ROGER P. KAMINSKI Senior Party (Application 08/766,351). _______________ Patent Interference No. 104,391 _______________ Before: McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and SCHAFER and LEE, Administrative Patent Judges. PER CURIUM. JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO 37 CFR § 1.662 Vaillancourt has filed a paper titled FILING OF AGREEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH TERMINATION OF THE INTERFERENCE UNDER 35 U.S.C. 135 (Paper 15). The paper states: “Attached is an Agreement effective January 31, 2000 between the senior party and junior party toPage: 1 2 3 4 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007