DIFUSCO V. REINA et al. - Page 4




          Interference No. 104,392                                                    
          Difusco v. Reina                                                            


               FURTHER ORDERED that junior party MARTIN A. DIFUSCO is                 
          not entitled to a patent containing his application claims 1-               
          19 which correspond to the count;                                           
               FURTHER ORDERED that senior party LEO REINA and JAMES                  
          SORGANI are. on this record, entitled to their application                  
          claims 1-15, 20, 24, 25, and 28-30 which correspond to the                  
          count; and                                                                  
               FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of the attachment to the                   
          joint request for entry of adverse judgment, i.e., paper                    
          having the caption of the junior party’s involved application,              
          abandoning junior party’s involved application, and signed by               
          junior party’s counsel, will be placed in the official file of              
          junior party’s involved application 08/991,800 as the next                  
          paper in that file.                                                         







                                                                                     
                         Fred E. McKelvey, Senior   )                                 
                         Administrative Patent Judge)                                 
                                                  )                                   

                                          4                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007