Appeal No. 1996-3589 Application No. 08/098,325 provide a teaching regarding the height of the bosses or recognize a criticality as to boss density, distribution or dual patterns, and 3) Nystrand uses a different density combination than that claimed and does not recognize a height for two separate embossing patterns as being different. Appellants, however, do not address the discussion in our opinion regarding how Schulz and Nystrand apply to appellants’ claims, and present a specific argument as to why appellants consider our analysis to be incorrect. Consequently, we are not convinced of error in our decision. We have reconsidered our decision but, for the reason given above, decline to make any change thereto. DENIED BRADLEY R. GARRIS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT CHUNG K. PAK ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007