Appeal No. 1996-3589
Application No. 08/098,325
provide a teaching regarding the height of the bosses or
recognize a criticality as to boss density, distribution or
dual patterns, and 3) Nystrand uses a different density
combination than that claimed and does not recognize a height
for two separate embossing patterns as being different.
Appellants, however, do not address the discussion in our
opinion regarding how Schulz and Nystrand apply to appellants’
claims, and present a specific argument as to why appellants
consider our analysis to be incorrect. Consequently, we are
not convinced of error in our decision.
We have reconsidered our decision but, for the reason
given above, decline to make any change thereto.
DENIED
BRADLEY R. GARRIS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
CHUNG K. PAK ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007