Ex parte WILLS et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                   
               today (1) was not written for publication in a law                     
               journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                 
                                                               Paper No. 14           


                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                  ________________                                    
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                  ________________                                    
                   Ex parte KENDALL S. WILLS and PAUL A. RODRIGUEZ                    
                                  ________________                                    
                                Appeal No. 1997-1390                                  
                             Application No. 08/485,199                               
                                  ________________                                    
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                  ________________                                    

          Before KIMLIN, GARRIS and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.              
          KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        



                                REQUEST FOR REHEARING                                 
               Appellants request reconsideration of our decision of                  
          November 8, 1999, wherein we reversed the examiner's rejection              
          of claims 18-28 under 35 U.S.C.  103, and affirmed the                     
          examiner's rejection of claims 27-30 under 35 U.S.C.  112,                 
          first paragraph.  Appellants make no argument regarding our                 
                                         -1-                                          




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007