THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte SHEDRICK D. JONES
________________
Appeal No. 1999-0117
Application 08/702,948
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before ABRAMS, STAAB and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.
REQUEST FOR REHEARING
Appellant requests rehearing of our decision of September
22, 1999, wherein we (1) affirmed the examiner’s final rejection
of claims 6-15 as being based on an original disclosure that
fails to comply with the written description requirement found in
the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112, and (2) dismissed the
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007