Appeal No. 2000-0207
Application 08/892,836
The copy of Claim 28 as submitted in Appellants’ Brief and
indicated by the examiner to be a correct copy does not appear to
agree with the claim presented by appellants in their amendment
filed on June 2, 1997 in Paper No. 11. The first two lines of
part (c) should read as follows: “c) a first uppermost cutting
level comprising superabrasive gains and successive uppermost
cutting levels among the plurality of cutting levels of each
tooth;”.
Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that the application is remanded to the
Examiner for the following matters:
(1) consideration of the IDS (Paper No. 18) in accordance
with the pertinent rules;
(2) consideration of the Declaration (attached to
Paper No. 11);
(3) consideration of the petition to change inventorship
(Paper No. 14);
(4) appropriate entry of Amendment B (Paper No. 11);
(5) correction of the appendix of claims on appeal so as to
include a correct copy of appealed claim 28; and
(6) for such further action as may be appropriate.
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007