Appeal No. 2000-0008 Page 6 Application No. 08/842,990 In view of the foregoing, we will not sustain the rejection of claim 8 and claims 3, 4 and 7 dependent therefrom. The examiner may want to consider whether the claimed subject matter is patentable over the teachings of Hotta alone or in combination with other prior art references. The decision is reversed. REVERSED JOHN P. McQUADE ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) JENNIFER D. BAHR ) Administrative Patent Judge )Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007