Appeal No. 2000-0053 Application 08/829,863 porous, permeable sedimentary rock of a subterranean formation, is not reasonably pertinent to the problem addressed by Clay, which is eliminating storage tank dead volume to prevent product contamination and loss of stored product. See Clay, 966 F.2d at 659-60, 23 USPQ2d at 1061. The same differences between the fields of endeavor of Sydansk and Clay exist between the fields of endeavor of Sydansk and the appellants. The primary problems addressed by Clay are loss of product to a storage tank’s dead volume between the outlet and the bottom of the tank, and contamination of the product by contaminants settled in this dead volume (col. 1, lines 54- 61). The problem addressed by Sydansk is as dissimilar to the problem addressed by the appellants, which is leakage from the bottom of a hydrocarbon storage tank caused by corrosion or pitting damage (specification, page 1, lines 16-18), as it is to the storage tank dead space problem addressed by Clay. Moreover, Clay addresses another problem, not discussed by the court, which is solved by his process, namely, leakage from a hydrocarbon storage tank caused by rust or corrosion (col. 2, lines 13-17). This is the problem addressed by the 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007