Ex parte SHIM et al. - Page 11




          Appeal No. 2000-0085                                                        
          Application No. 08/802,582                                                  


          known in the art to constitute a “frangible” means (answer,                 
          pages 4 and 5), we find no mention of Mylar in the disclosure               
          of the FitzGerald patent.  In column 3, lines 1-6, FitzGerald               
          indicates that the rupture member (12) may be made of a                     
          variety of non-metallic materials, including “a variety of                  
          plastics, resins[,] and other materials such as graphite which              
          is presently preferred,” but nowhere mentions Mylar                         
          specifically.  Accordingly, the examiner’s rejection of claim               
          3 and of claims 9 through 12 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 will                     
          likewise not be sustained.                                                  



















                                         11                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007