Ex parte SUZUKI et al. - Page 21




          Appeal No. 2000-0117                                      Page 21           
          Application No. 08/770,676                                                  


               The decision of the examiner to reject claims 2 and 7 as               
          being unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over Matsushita,                
          Igaue, Daio, DesMarais and UniCharm will not be sustained.                  


               The decision of the examiner to reject claim 9 as being                
          unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over the collective                   
          teachings of Matsushita, Igaue, Daio, DesMarais and UniCharm                
          will be sustained.                                                          





























Page:  Previous  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007