Appeal No. 2000-0128 Application 08/590,722 Since we do not sustain the rejection of independent claims 1 and 10 on appeal, we also reverse the rejection of their respective dependent claims. Therefore, the decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1, 3 through 10 and 12 through 18 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) is reversed. REVERSED James D. Thomas ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT Lee E. Barrett ) Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) ) INTERFERENCES ) Stuart S. Levy ) Administrative Patent Judge ) JDT/cam 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007