Ex parte NIELSEN et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 2000-0141                                       Page 3           
          Application No. 08/673,693                                                  


                    1.   A computer controlled method for altering                    
               bandwidth allocation when downloading information to                   
               a computer for display to a user; said computer                        
               having a display device, a network interface to a                      
               network, a gaze-tracking device, and a bandwidth                       
               allocation mechanism; said gaze-tracking device                        
               determining a gaze                                                     
               position on said display device; said computer                         
               controlled method comprising the steps of:                             
                    (a) identifying an area of interest to said                       
               user on said display device using said gaze                            
               position;                                                              
                    (b) determining an existing bandwidth                             
               allocation directed to said area of interest; and                      
                    (c) increasing said existing bandwidth                            
               allocation to said area of interest.                                   
               (Appeal Br. at 11.)                                                    


               The prior art applied by the examiner in rejecting the                 
          claims follows:                                                             
               Ruoff, Jr. (“Ruoff”)     4,513,317           Apr. 23, 1985             
               Bouve et al. (“Bouve”)   5,682,525           Oct. 28, 1997             
                                             (filed Jan. 11, 1995).                   
          Claims 1-28 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious              
          over Ruoff in view of Bouve.                                                


                                       OPINION                                        







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007