Appeal No. 2000-0182 Page 14 Application No. 08/831,327 Indeed, the fundamental purpose of a patent claim is to define the scope of protection5 and hence what the claim precludes others from doing. All things considered, because a patentee has the right to exclude others from making, using and selling the invention covered by a United States letters patent, the public must be apprised of what the patent covers, so that those who approach the area circumscribed by the claims of a patent may more readily and accurately determine the boundaries of protection in evaluating the possibility of infringement and dominance. See In re Hammack, 427 F.2d 1378, 1382, 166 USPQ 204, 208 (CCPA 1970). In the present case, we have reviewed the appellants' disclosure to help us determine the meaning of the above-noted terminology from claim 1 and as noted previously have found no support therefore. Thus, the disclosure does not provide explicit guidelines defining the term "substantially" as used in the terminology "increasing substantially monotonically " (claim 1). Furthermore, it is our view that there are no guidelines that would be implicit to one skilled in the art defining the 5 See In re Vamco Machine & Tool, Inc., 752 F.2d 1564, 224 USPQ 617 (Fed. Cir. 1985).Page: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007