Ex parte HARRELL et al. - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of                 
          the Board.                                                                  
                                                            Paper No. 13              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                  Ex parte JEFFREY A. HARRELL and STEVEN C. BARNETT                   
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 2000-0185                                  
                               Application 08/847,111                                 
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                      

          Before ABRAMS, FRANKFORT, and STAAB, Administrative Patent                  
          Judges.                                                                     
          FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                     



                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                 
          rejection of claims 1 through 6, 8 through 22 and 24 through                
          34. Claims 7 and 23, which are the only other claims remaining              
          in the application, stand objected to, but have been indicated              
          by the examiner to be allowable if rewritten in independent                 

                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007