Appeal No. 2000-0198 Page 9
Application No. 08/400,178
35 U.S.C. § 112, sixth paragraph, of the structure disclosed by the appellant in the
specification.
For the reasons explained above, we find that the combined teachings of Kenna,
Demane and Schelhas fail to establish a prima facie case of obviousness with regard to
the subject matter recited in independent claim 22 and, it follows, in dependent claim 23.
We will not sustain the rejection.
SUMMARY
The rejection is not sustained.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007