Appeal No. 2000-0201
Application No. 08/691,330
be derived from a reading of exemplary claims 1, 3, and 4,
respective copies of which appear in “APPENDIX A” of the main
brief (Paper No. 20).
As evidence of obviousness, the examiner has applied the
documents listed below:
Okubo 5,369,585 Nov. 29, 1994
Yoshino 5,378,052 Jan. 03, 1995
The following rejection is before us for review.
Claims 1 through 7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §
103(a) as being unpatentable over Yoshino in view of Okubo.
The full text of the examiner’s rejection and response to
the argument presented by appellants appears in the final
rejection and the answer (Paper Nos. 15 and 21), while the
complete statement of appellants’ argument can be found in the
main and reply briefs (Paper Nos. 20 and 22).
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007