Ex parte REINHARDT et al. - Page 5




          Appeal No. 2000-0210                                       Page 5           
          Application No. 08/893,906                                                  


          materials for use as the anti-adhesive to be added to the                   
          backing ring, nor is it disclosed how this anti-adhesive may                
          be added."                                                                  


               The appellants argue (brief, p. 7) (1) that the                        
          specification clearly teaches that an anti-adhesive can be                  
          added to the polymer that the backing ring is made of, and (2)              
          that a person skilled in the art would know to mix the anti-                
          adhesive with the polymer before the backing ring is molded.                


               An analysis of whether the claims under appeal are                     
          supported by an enabling disclosure requires a determination                
          of whether that disclosure contained sufficient information                 
          regarding the subject matter of the appealed claim as to                    
          enable one skilled in the pertinent art to make and use the                 
          claimed invention.  The test for enablement is whether one                  
          skilled in the art could make and use the claimed invention                 
          from the disclosure coupled with information known in the art               
          without undue experimentation.  See United States v.                        
          Telectronics, Inc., 857 F.2d 778, 785, 8 USPQ2d 1217, 1223                  









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007