Ex parte JODOIN et al. - Page 4



          Appeal No. 2000-0238                                                        
          Application 08/342,283                                                      


          output image substantially void of the particular, unique binary            
          pixel structure” is disclosed or otherwise taught in Matsunawa.             
          This removing operation of independent claim 15 on appeal is                
          consistent with the showing disclosed in Figures 2 and 3.                   
               As to Matsunawa, this reference continually discusses its              
          ability to discriminate, sort and extract patterns of information           
          from an original image or picture.  Although these terms are used           
          in the reference to describe in effect an identification                    
          operation in accordance with the subject matter of claim 15 on              
          appeal, each                                                                
          of them falls short of actually removing an identified region to            
          produce an output image substantially void of that region.                  
          In other words, no discriminated, sorted or extracted region is             
          removed according to the teachings of Matsunawa.  The                       
          identifiable character information in regions 1 and 2 and the               
          identified continuous tone information in regions 3 and 4 of the            
          original picture in Figure 14 remain in the pattern sorted                  
          picture version in Figure 15 as well as in the resulting picture            
          of the extracted regions in Figure 16.                                      







                                           4                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007