Appeal No. 2000-0289 Page 6
Application No. 08/753,542
We will not sustain the rejection of claims 8 to 10 and
14 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b).
To support a rejection of a claim under 35 U.S.C. §
102(b), it must be shown that each element of the claim is
found, either expressly described or under principles of
inherency, in a single prior art reference. See Kalman v.
Kimberly-Clark Corp., 713 F.2d 760, 772, 218 USPQ 781, 789
(Fed. Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1026 (1984).
The appellants argue (brief, pp. 11-12) that both
Caneavri and Griffin fail to disclose the claimed first and
second blade members which each have "narrow, non-shearing
flattened edges." We agree. In that regard, the term
"narrow" must be given its broadest reasonable interpretation
consistent with the specification. See In re Sneed, 710 F.2d
1544, 1548, 218 USPQ 385, 388 (Fed. Cir. 1983). The American
Heritage Dictionary, Second College Edition, (1982) defines
"narrow" as "of small or slender width." As shown in Figure
2, for instance, the appellants disclose that flattened inner
edges 34, 36 extend only a small distance from the bottom of
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007