Appeal No. 2000-0341
Application No. 08/849,169
before the end of the prior authorized time, it does not
exclude the situation where the operator can wait until the
prior authorized operation time has expired and then have the
reauthorization granted by the suggested wireless
communication.
Therefore, we sustain the obviousness rejection of claim
3 and 4 (claim 4 has not be argued separately). Accordingly,
the
decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 3 and 4 under 35
U.S.C.
§ 103 over Keating in view of Uekusa is affirmed.
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007