Appeal No. 2000-0344 Application No. 08/718,408 “The oxidation of ? -5-steroidal alkenes to the corresponding enones is an important step in the synthesis of steroid end-products useful as 5a-reductase inhibitors. Chromium based oxidations have previously been used for the oxidation of allylic groups, but are environmentally unacceptable and require silica gel chromatography. The instant invention provides an improved alternative method for oxidizing ? -5-steroidal alkenes.” Id., pages 1-2. “Particularly, this invention involves conversion of ? -5-steroidal alkenes to ? -5-7- keto-steroidal alkenes using a ruthenium based catalyst in the presence of a hydroperoxide.” Id., page 2. Discussion The examiner rejected all of the claims as obvious over the disclosure of either Pearson or Muzart, combined with Neumann. The examiner characterizes Pearson as teaching a process for the allylic oxidation of a variety of alkenes using t- butyl hydroperoxide in the presence of a chromium -based catalyst. . . . The reference specially teaches the oxidation of 5-ene steroids and the production of 5-ene-7-one steroids. Examiner’s Answer, page 4. The examiner cites Muzart as teaching exactly the same thing. See the Examiner’s Answer, page 5. The examiner acknowledges that Pearson and Muzart do not use a ruthenium-based catalyst, as recited in the instant claims. Neumann is cited to make up this difference. The examiner states that Neumann teaches “oxidation of alkenes using different oxidants including t-butyl hydroperoxide in the presence of a ruthenium based catalyst.” The examiner concluded that it would 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007