Ex parte NIELSEN - Page 2




                   Appeal No. 2000-0357                                                                                                                           
                   Application 08/941,186                                                                                                                         


                            Representative independent claim 1 is reproduced as follows:                                                                          

                            1.  A computer, comprising:                                                                                                           

                            a. a processor, and                                                                                                                   

                            b. a graphical user interface, running on said processor, said graphical user interface comprising                                    
                   a sort routine for rearranging table data based on one or more hidden sort keys.                                                               

                            The examiner relies on the following references:                                                                                      

                   MacGregor et al. (MacGregor)                       5,396,621                              Mar.  7, 1995                                        

                   Stodghill et al. (Stodghill)                               5,710,901                              Jan. 20, 1998                                
                   (filed Dec. 29, 1995)                                                                                                                          

                   Minakuchi et al. (Minakuchi)                          5,745,891                              Apr. 28, 1998                                     
                   (filed Sep. 27, 1996)                                                                                                                          

                            Claims 1-18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103.  As evidence of obviousness, the examiner                                             

                   offers MacGregor and Stodghill with regard to claims 1-3, 9, 10 and 12-18, adding Minakuchi with                                               

                   regard to claims 4-8 and 11.                                                                                                                   

                            Reference is made to the brief and answer for the respective positions of appellant and the                                           

                   examiner.                                                                                                                                      

                                                                          OPINION                                                                                 

                            At the outset, we note appellant’s indication, at page 8 of the brief, of certain informalities in the                                

                   claims, and we leave to the good auspices of the examiner and appellant any necessary amendments to                                            

                   cause claim 11 to depend from claim 10, rather than from claim 8.                                                                              


                                                                                2                                                                                 




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007