Ex parte BEACH et al. - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
                   publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.             
                                                            Paper No. 25              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                        Ex parte TODD P. BEACH and BRET WAHL                          
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 2000-0486                                  
                             Application No. 08/853,651                               
                                   ______________                                     
                                HEARD: March 15, 2001                                 
                                   _______________                                    

          Before CALVERT, ABRAMS, and GONZALES, Administrative Patent                 
          Judges                                                                      
          GONZALES, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner's final              
          rejection of claims 1 through 30, which are all of the claims               
          in the application.  The appellants have confined the appeal                
          to only claims 23 through 30 (main brief, page 2).                          
          Consequently, the appeal as to claims 1 through 22 is hereby                
          dismissed, leaving for review the standing rejection of claims              
          23 through 30.                                                              
                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007