Appeal No. 2000-0506 Application 08/979,592 Von Herrmann (‘954) 1 3,168,954 Feb. 9, 1965 Von Herrmann (‘013) 3,591,013 Jul. 6, 1971 Drain 4,693,443 Sep. 15, 1987 Cauffman et al. (Cauffman) 5,048,782 Sep. 17, 1991 Claims 1 through 3, 6, 8 through 10, 12 through 15 and 18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Von Herrmann (‘013) in view of Cauffman. Claims 1 through 3, 6, 8 through 10, 12 through 15 and 18 also stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Drain in view of Von Herrmann (‘954) and Cauffman. Reference is made to the answer (Paper No. 11, mailed 1 While this reference has not been listed by the examiner on page 3 of the examiner’s answer as being part of the prior art relied upon in a rejection of the claims under appeal, we observe that it is readily apparent from the statement of rejection on pages 6 and 7 of the answer that the examiner is in fact relying on Von Herrmann (3,168,954) in a rejection of the claims on appeal. Thus, we have listed this reference as being relied upon. 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007