The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte GEERT LIEVENS
____________
Appeal No. 2000-0534
Application No. 08/929,543
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, FRANKFORT
and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 to 5, 7, 8 and 20 to 23. Claims 11 to
13, 15 to 19 and 27 to 30 have been allowed. Claims 6, 9 and
24 to 26 have been objected to as depending from a non-allowed
claim. Clams 10, 14, 31 and 32 have been canceled.
We REVERSE and enter a new rejection pursuant to 37 CFR
§ 1.196(b).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007