Appeal No. 2000-0582
Application 08/851,017
the above noted deficiencies of Wieland with respect to the
“braking” limitations in parent claims 1 and 3.
Therefore, we shall not sustain the standing 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) rejection of claims 2 and 7 as being unpatentable
over Wieland in view of Malachowski.
SUMMARY
The decision of the examiner to reject claims 1 through
3, 7 and 8 is reversed.
REVERSED
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007