The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 19 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte CLAUDE TIHON ____________ Appeal No. 2000-0651 Application No. 09/024,732 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before COHEN, FRANKFORT, and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges. COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 9 through 16. These claims constitute all of the claims remaining in the application. Appellant’s invention pertains to a urethral drain. A basic understanding of the invention can be derived from aPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007