Ex parte BYDLON et al. - Page 7




         Appeal No. 2000-0652                                      Page 7          
         Application No. 08/868,774                                                


         instrument comprises essentially a body 1, a s1iding tubular              
         support 2, a container 3, a hollow needle 4, a mouthpiece 5, a            
         propulsion spring 6 and a latch 7.  Ben Moura teaches (column             
         2, lines 32-39) that the instrument body 1 may be formed of               
         plastic material or of metal and, is of elongated shape and               
         has a configuration such as to afford a convenient grip for               
         the user.  As shown in Figures 2-3, the body 1 is provided                
         with hollowed-out portions 11 and in which the operator's                 
         fingers may be placed in order to ensure a perfect grip.  The             
         sliding support 2 is constituted by a tubular member which is             
         capable of sliding axially within a bore 14 of the body 1.  In            
         Figure 3, the sectional view of the sliding support 2 appears             
         to be hatched to indicate metal.                                          


              It is the position of the examiner (answer, p. 4) that               
         Ben Moura teaches a gripping layer of plastic (i.e., body 1)              
         covering a metal base (i.e., sliding support 2) and that it               
         would be inherent that the plastic material of body 1 would be            
         a softer material than the metal support 2.  We do not agree.             
         In that regard, it is not clear from the disclosure of Ben                
         Moura that the missing descriptive matter (i.e., that the                 







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007