The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte CHRISTOPHER J. KARGULA, MARK A. BOGUCKI, STEVEN T. SLUNICK,
WILLIAM E. STEVENS, LAKSHMANA S. NARAHARISETTI and DENNIS G. KINDER
____________
Appeal No. 2000-0655
Application No. 08/522,017
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before CALVERT, ABRAMS and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 11, 13-15,
17, 19, 20, 22 and 23. At that point, claim 16 had been indicated as containing allowable
subject matter, and the other claims had been canceled. In the Answer, the examiner
indicated that claims 17,19, 20, 22 and 23 are allowable. This leaves claims 11 and 13-15
before us on appeal.
We AFFIRM.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007