The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 17 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte FUMIO ISHIHARA, MUTSUMI NARUSE, TAKANORI KOHNO TETSUO SAKAMOTO, KOUICHI KOBAYASHI, TERUYUKI TONGU NORIFUMI NAKAGAWA, TOMIO KUROSU _____________ Appeal No. 2000-0757 Application No. 09/021,393 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before KRASS, JERRY SMITH and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges. KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 9, 33 and 35-38. Claims 1-8 and 10-15 have been canceled and claims 16-32 and 34 have been withdrawn from consideration due to a restriction requirement. The invention pertains to controlling exposure in a camera. More particularly, although two-area photo-sensors for divided brightness measurement are known, the 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007