Ex parte HARVEY - Page 2




                     Appeal No. 2000-0759                                                                                                                                              
                     Application No. 08/772,198                                                                                                                                        


                     Appellant's invention relates to a fiber optic coupler                                                                                                            
                     and clip assembly for inserting into an opening in a panel                                                                                                        
                     (claim 11) and to a coupler, clip and panel combination (claim                                                                                                    
                     8).  An adequate understanding of the claimed subject matter                                                                                                      
                     can be had from a reading of illustrative claims 8 and 11, a                                                                                                      
                     copy of which is attached to this decision.1                                                                                                                      


                     The single prior art reference of record relied upon by                                                                                                           
                     the examiner in rejecting the appealed claims is:                                                                                                                 
                     Bailey et al. (Bailey)                                           3,446,467                                            May 27,                                     
                     1969                                                                                                                                                              
                     Claims 8 through 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103                                                                                                          
                     as being unpatentable over Bailey.  The examiner's position                                                                                                       
                     regarding this rejection is found on pages 3 and 4 of the                                                                                                         
                     answer (Paper No. 15, mailed November 8, 1999).                                                                                                                   


                     Reference is made to the answer (Paper No. 15) for the                                                                                                            
                     examiner's reasoning in support of the rejection and response                                                                                                     

                                1Contrary to the examiner's statement in the answer (page                                                                                              
                     2), we note that the copy of claim 8 set forth in the Appendix                                                                                                    
                     to appellant's brief is not a correct copy of the claim.  A                                                                                                       
                     correct copy of claim 8 may be found in Paper No. 3.                                                                                                              
                                                                                          2                                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007